New Swimming Pool Regulation Might Impact Public Swimming Pools in Texas
Congress and administrative agencies in Washington are continually considering new laws and regulations focused in part on making Americans safer. Rules intended to limit swimming pool accidents are no exception. Recently the commission that governs swimming pool safety revised rules regarding a 2008 law in an effort to prevent horrible accident where children are trapped in pool drains.
As ABC-7 in El Paso recently reported, the Consumer Product Safety Commission just voted to revoke guidance it issued about a year and a half ago. The guidance was released to help public pools comply with a 2008 law. The law in question changed how swimming pool drains must be protected in order to minimize the chance that swimmers are trapped under water. The law was passed after several children drowned after they were caught in drains. The original guidance issued about eighteen months ago permitted “unblockable” drain covers. But lately concerns have grown that unblockable drains can break, become loose, or be installed incorrectly. In those instances, the unblockable drain cannot function as designed, making it ineffective in protecting swimmers from the drain. The new guidance instead requires that public pools have a back-up system that can completely shut down suction in the case of an emergency.
Opponents of the new regulation fear that it will be costly. And pools that do not have a back-up system may not be able to open in May, if one is not installed before the beginning of the swimming season. Supporters of the new rule believe it will save lives. It is not clear how many public pools in Texas will be impacted by the new rule. Nonetheless, the new rule may have a major impact in the unfortunate event that a swimmer is entrapped.
Our Texas swimming pool lawyer knows these change in regulations may also impact future accident lawsuits. Legal negligence rules generally require a showing of a duty and a breach of that duty for a plaintiff to established that a defendant should be held liable for the consequences of an accident. In some instances, however, violation of a law (such as these new regulations) can be prima facie evidence of negligence. Proof of that rule’s violation may be enough to assume negligence. In other words, it means that breaking the law can satisfy the first step in a lawsuit. Rather than forcing the plaintiff to show all the elements of his or her case, when a prima facie case has been satisfied, the plaintiff is able to move forward and the defense must rebut the charges.
.
When most local community members think about a

